<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Extended Memory</title>
    <link>https://cmyers.org/blog/</link>
    <description>Recent content on Extended Memory</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2025, Carl Myers.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://cmyers.org/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Ranked Skills</title>
      <link>https://cmyers.org/blog/ranked-skills/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://cmyers.org/blog/ranked-skills/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Technical resumes are challenging to produce, and challenging to accurately&#xA;interpret.  One of the biggest obvious challenges is that candidates are highly&#xA;motivated to exaggerate, and interpreters of resumes are highly motivated to&#xA;make a quick decision erring on the side of rejection so as to waste a minimal&#xA;amount of their precious time.  Another big challenge, however, one which I&#xA;think might be solved, is the difficulty in commnicating exactly what the&#xA;resume author means by how skilled they are in a particular technology or&#xA;specialty.  Even if one were to assume candidates are 100% truthful and resume&#xA;readers give 100% effort to read and parse every word of every resume that&#xA;comes across their desks, what does &amp;ldquo;Expert at Python&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;5 years experience&#xA;C++&amp;rdquo; really mean?  Worse yet, someone says (or writes on their resume) &amp;ldquo;I am 8&#xA;/ 10 at Ruby&amp;rdquo; - what does that mean?  Eight what?  Years?  Projects?  This&#xA;person thinks they know 80% of everything there is to know about Ruby?  Or are&#xA;in the 80th percentile for Ruby programmers?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
